跳至正文

Relational Peacebuilding Methodology


Dr Jeremy Ive, Senior Advisor © 2026

Core Principles

The missing link between development and security.

  • Across the political divides
  • Future-orientated
  • Based on shared principles

Three Tracks of Peace Facilitation

Tracks One, Two, and Three:

  • Not mutually exclusive
  • Reinforce one another

Track One: High-level facilitation among those in positions of top leadership. Addresses the immediate steps required to be put into place for a peace settlement.

Track Two: Intermediate-level facilitation on a low-profile basis. Middle-distance in its focus.

Track Three: More specific focus: a region or locality, and/or single issues.

Track Two Peacebuilding: Two Functions

Catalysts

Build background trust to resolve sticking points.

Consensus-Builders

Develop and disseminate a common framework for peace.

Initial NPI Conference March 1987

  • Document setting out constitutional alternatives
  • Participants across racial and political divides

Newick Park Initiative (NPI) on South Africa: Consultations 1987 – 1991

Two Secret Track One Processes

Between…

  • Senior Afrikaners and ANC outside SA
  • SA Government and Mandela inside SA

A Relational Audit of NPI

5 Relational Principles (see The Relational Lens, Cambridge University Press, 2016):

  1. Parity: Mutual recognition.
  2. Directness: Quality communication.
  3. Continuity: Unfolded over time.
  4. Multiplexity: Breadth of knowledge.
  5. Commonality: Shared goals.

Key Elements of Relational Peacebuilding

  • Shared principles
  • Key people
  • Safe and neutral venue
  • A series of meetings
  • Consensus built
  • Transmitted to political leaders

Confidential but not secret: Chatham House rule.

Application: 7 Key Steps

1. Confidential Profile

Chatham House Rule | Safe space to facilitate sustainable consultations | Attend in personal capacities | Supportive consultation.

2. Maintaining Neutrality

  • Non-partisan identity
  • Personal capacities
  • Neutrality in funding

3. Relational Principles

  • Treat all as equals
  • Facilitate direct communication
  • Commit to a sustained process
  • Encourage grasp of background
  • Focus on shared values

4. Partnership & Complementary Roles

Leverage FSF’s political access… to act as a catalyst for initial dialogue while… using consensus-builders who help develop common frameworks for peace.

5. Catalysts: Mapping the Range of Actors

  • Listening-first approach
  • In touch with the principals
  • Building personal trust

6. Consensus-Building: Bridging the Gap – MCD

  • Start with practical cooperation
  • Establish a “middle-distance” focus
  • Facilitating “middle-distance” structures
  • Research-led dialogue

7. Defining Long-Term Success

  • Resolution of “sticking points”
  • Platform creation
  • Sustained dialogue

Summary: Process vs. Objective

Process StepCatalystConsensus-BuilderRealisation Objective
ObjectiveOpen a secure, low-profile channelEstablish a shared frameworkSmooth transition
Operational ModeHigh confidentialityResearch-ledTransmitting pre-negotiated frameworks
Focus AreasResolving sticking pointsWeighing constitutional alternativesImplementing resilient, pre-agreed structures